-
Berikut adalah komen dan persoalan yang dilontarkan oleh Prof Madya Dr Abdul Rani Bin Kamarudin, pensyarah (Public Law) di IIUM, di ruangan komen, di sini.
"The Federal Court (5 judges) unanimously held (9th April 2009) that the Election Commission had the authority to determine whether there is or not a casual vacancy.
Indeed Sivakumar is brave enough in thinking that he was above and over the Election Commission. (see http://jelas.info/2009/02/19/brave-sivakumar/#comment-180273 wrongly or rightly decided, these 5 Federal Court judges cannot agree with Sivakumar.
Soalan seterusnya adalah, adakah dia (V. Sivakumar) mengatasi Sultan pula apabila menggantung Dato' Zambry dan EXCOnya?"
Prof Madya Dr Abdul Rani Bin Kamarudin,
Pensyarah (Public Law) IIUM
Perbincangan & artikel berkaitan:
1. Sivakumar tidak berhak buat perisytiharan
2. Ulasan Hujah TV9 "Krisis di Perak" oleh Prof Madya Dr Abdul Rani Bin Kamarudin
+
Langgan:
Catat Ulasan (Atom)
Arkib
-
▼
2009
(142)
-
▼
April
(18)
- Tuntutan Bubar DUN Perak: Lain Hulu Lain Parang...
- Raja Nazrin tekad pertahan institusi beraja daripa...
- Pencabulan Undang-Undang; Ketuanan Pakatan Rakyat;...
- Penggantungan MB Perak & 6 Exco: V. Sivakumar guna...
- Bumi Dipijak Milik Orang
- UMNO perlu jadi jaguh Melayu & Bumiputra
- Kuasa penentu Melayu hilang jika terus berpecah
- Sun Tzu's Art of War
- Penggantungan Dato' Dr Zambry & EXCO: V. Sivakumar...
- Sivakumar tidak berhak buat perisytiharan
- Bkt Gantang: Kisah Kemenangan (Kekalahan) PAS & Ke...
- Buat renungan semua...
- Mufti sepakat hentikan persenda al-Quran
- PRK Bukit Gantang: Peluang Kemenangan BN Cerah
- Dr M sertai UMNO
- Dato' Sri Najib Perdana Menteri Malaysia Ke-6
- Ulasan Hujah TV9 “Krisis di Perak” oleh Prof Madya...
- Belek-belek gambar baru dan gambar lama..
-
▼
April
(18)
Label
'Masalah Sikap' vs 'Cemburu'
#justiceforMH17
16 September 2008
1Malaysia
1MDB
22 tahun tanpa konflik kaum
3 billion
31 Ogos 2009
5 Ogos 1957
Abdullah
ABIM
Acaro Solingan
Adik Siti Amynur Ain
AIDC
Air percuma
AirAsia
Akta hasutan
Akta Hasutan 1948
Akta Pendidikan 1996
Aktivis
Al-Fatihah
Allahyarham Tun Abdul Razak
Altantuya
Altel
Aman Malaysia
Ambiga
Anak Bangsa Malaysia?
Anak Wayang Pas
analisa PRU13
ancaman islam di Malaysia.
Anjing Gila
Anwar
Anwar Ibrahim
Azan
Azizan
Azmin Ali
babi
Badak Pekak
Badut
Bahasa Kebangsaan
Bahasa Malaysia
Bahasa Melayu
Bajet Pahang 2009
BALACI
Bangsa Malaysia
Banjir
Banjir di Kuantan
Banjir di Lipis
Bantuan
Barisan Nasional
Batal Usul Sekat Jualan Arak
Behind The Veil
Belasungkawa
BERSATU
Bersih
biadap
Biadap Hina Nabi
Blogger
BN
BN Perak
BOC
Boikot barangan israel
Boikot produk Yahudi-Amerika
Boikot Secara Terancang
Bomoh
Boneka
BR1M
Brader Anwar Bin Ibrahim
bubar UMNO
Bumi Daku
cadbury
calon boleh menang
Carlsberg halal
Cawangan UMNO
CDM25
Celaka
Ceroboh Tanah Milik TNB
chedet
Chin Peng
Chui Jui Meng
Cina
Cina Boikot Melayu
COMANGO
Criminalise War Exhibition and Conference 2009
Cuit: Dilema Melayu Moden
DAP
Datuk Ibrahim Ali
Datuk Mukhriz
Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir
DEB
deklarasi rakyat
Demi Negara
Demonstrasi
DERHAKA
diesel
Din Turtle
DNA babi
Dokumen Langkah kajang
Dong Zong
Double Standard Prosedure
Dr Abdul Rani Kamarudin
Dr Chandra Muzaffar
Dr Khir
Dr Novandri
Dr Ridhuan Tee Abdullah
Dr Sidek Baba
Dr Yusri Mohamad
Dr Zambry Kadir
Dr Zuhdi
Dr. M
DS Anwar
DS Anwar Ibrahim
DS Najib
DUN
DUN Perak
Durian Runtuh
Dyana Sofya
DYMM Paduka Seri Sultan Azlan Muhibuddin Shah
DYMM Sultan Azlan Shah
Dyna Sofya
DYTM Raja Dr Nazrin Shah
Ekonomi
Ekonomi Bumiputera
ekonomi melayu
Elizabeth Wong
Enakmen Agama Bukan Islam (Kawalan Pengembangan Di Kalangan Orang Islam) 1988 Selangor
Erniceda
Etnic Cleansing
Eurocopter
Evolusi Politik Melayu
Fatimah Zuhri's Blog
Fatwa Anti Tomboy
FELDA
FGV
fitnah
Fitnah Undi Pos
Flip-flop
Forum Peluk Islam
Foto
gabungan UMNO dan PAS.
gaza
Gerakan Razak
Gobalakrishnan
Hak Istimewa Melayu/Bumiputera
Hak Membeli
Hak Mengundi
Hansard Parlimen
Harakah
haram
harga minyak naik
Hari Kemerdekaan
hina
Hina Fatwa
Hina Islam
Hina Raja Melayu
Hindraf
Hipokrit
Hishammuddin Tun Hussein
Hishamuddin
Hj Hadi Awang
Hj Naser Disa
Hormati murtad
hudud
Hudud dan Qisas
Husam Musa
i want to tocuh a dog
i want to touch a dog
Ideotique
IFC
india
Institusi Raja
Islam
Islam Agama Persekutuan
Islam Agama Rasmi Persekutuan
Ismail Mina Ahmad
israel
Isu CAR
Isu Kalimah Allah
Isu Ketidakseimbangan Kaum
isu lahad datu
Isu Menteri Besar
Isu Moral
Isu Roboh Kuil
Isu Scorpene
Isu Tanah Kolej Taiping
Isu Tanah Perak
Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara
JAIS
JAKIM
Jambatan Bengkok
Jeff Ooi
Jenayah
Jom Bantu
Jumlah pengundi muda
Jurugambar Utusan
KAFA
Kaki Pembelit
kalimah Allah
Kamarudin Jaafar
KAR1SMA
Karpal Singh
Kaum Cina
Kaum Melayu
Kebaikan
Kebal
Kebebasan Bersuara
Kedah
Kedai Rakyat 1 Malaysia
keistimewaan Melayu
Kekejaman Israel ke atas umat Islam
kelvin yip
Kempen Satu Sekolah Untuk Semua
kerajaan islam
Keranda 152
Kes Datuk Nasaruddin Hashim (UMNO ke PKR)
Kes Liwat
Kesetiaan Kepada Raja dan Negara
Ketuanan DAP
Ketuanan Melayu
Ketuanan Pakatan Rakyat
Ketum
Khalid Ibrahim
Kiasu
KijangMas
Kiki
KKM
Kongres Ekonomi Islam Ketiga
Kontrak Sosial
kronisma
kuala kangsar
Kuala Lumpur Foundation To Criminalise War
Kuota Pemilikan 30 %
Kuota Pemilikan Rumah 50 %
Ladang Babi
Lateefa Koya
LBGT
Lee Kuan Yew
lembah klang
Lembah Pantai
Leong Ngah Ngah
LGBT
Liberalisasi?
Lidah 'tidak rasmi' Pakatan Rakyat = Malaysiakini
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Lina Joy
Logo Halal
logo halal JAKIM
Lompat Parti
Low Siew Moi
lowyat
M Manoharan
M-UPRo
Mah Siew Keong
Mahkamah Syariah
Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA)
Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan
Majlis Muafakat Melayu
Majlis Peguam
Malay Mail Cyberspot
Malaysia
malaysia bukan negara sekular
Malaysian Airline System
Malaysian Malaysia
Mangkat
Mangkuk Ayun Azmi Shahrom
Manifesto bukan janji
Marah-Marah Sayang
MAS
Masjid Besi Putrajaya
MB Kedah
MB selangor
MCA
media sosial
melayu
Melayu Pulau Pinang
Melayu Singapura
Membina Negara
mencari simcard Altel
Menteri besar Selangor
merdeka riview
Meroyan
MH17
MH370
MO1
Monopoli Ekonomi
Muhammad Firdaus Dullah
Muhyiddin
Murtad
Muslim UPRo
Mustafa Ali
Musuh islam
Musuh Melayu
Musuh Negara
Muzakarah Cendekiawan Islam 2009
MyKad
Najib
Najib Tun Razak
Nasrudin Hassan
negara islam
negara sekular
Negarawan Ulung
Nga kor ming
Ngeh Koo Ham
Nik Aziz
Nilai
Nizar
Nizar Boneka DAP
Nurul Izzah
Obama
octoberfest
octoberfest2014
OKU
OKU dikurung
OKU terbiar
Omar Ong
One utama
Open Letter by Matthias Chang
PAC
Pahang Darul Makmur
Pakatan
Pakatan Haram
Pakatan Rakyat
Pakatan Rakyat Perak
Pakatan Rakyat. pertusan undi cina
Palestin
Paneh Miang
PAP
Parlimen
Parti baru Tun M
Parti tunggal
PAS
Pas selangor
Pas Terengganu
PAS youth
Pasca PRU-13
PAU Ke-59
Peguam Negara
Pelacuran
Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006-2010
PEMBELA
Pembohong
Pembubaran parlimen
Pemuda UMNO
Pemuda UMNO Bahagaian Segambut
Pemuda UMNO Pahang
Penamaan Calon
Pencemaran
Pencerobohan Tanah Kerajaan
Peneroka
Pengganas Komunis
Pengkhianat
pengkhianat negara
Pengundi Atas Pagar
Penyata Razak 1956
Perak
Perbandingan
Perdana Menteri Malaysia Ke-6
perkara 11
Perkara 11 Perlembagaan
Perkara 12
perkara 121
Perkara 152
Perkara 153
perkara 3
Perkara 3 Perlembagaan
PERKASA
perkauman
Perkhidmatan Awam Pulau Pinang
perkongsian kuasa.
Perlembagaan
Perlembagaan Persekutuan
Perlembagaan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu
Perpaduan
Perpaduan Melayu/Islam
Persekutuan Tanah Melayu
pesawat MAS terhempas
pesta arak
pesta arak terbuka
Petisyen
petrol
Petronas
Pilihanraya Masjid
PKM
PKNS
PKPIM
PKR
Polarisasi Kaum
Politik Perak
Portal Kempen SSS
PPSMI
PR
PRK Bagan Pinang
PRK Bukit Gantang
PRK Galas
PRK Kuala Terengganu
PRK Teluk Intan
PRN
pro-pembangkang
produk cina
produk melayu
Prof Dr Aziz Bari
Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim
Prof. P Ramasamy
propaganda
PRU 14
PRU12
PRU13
Puasa Ramadhan
Pulau Pinang
Puppet Master
Putera Sultan Selangor
Putrajaya
Qarinah
Qazaf
Rabindranath Tagore
racist
Raja Nong Chick
Raja-Raja Melayu
Rakyat Malaysia?
Rasuah
Razak Baginda
RBA
Reaksi pemimpin politik
Reflections: Melayu Lama
Ronnie Liu
Rukun Negara
Rusia
Rusia Border
Rusuhan
Saham FGV
Saiful Bukhari Azlan
Sakmongkol AK47
Salah Guna Kuasa
SAR
Sastera
Satira
Satu Malaysia
Sekolah Agama
Sekolah Kebangsaan
Sekolah Satu Aliran
Sekolah Vernakular
Seks
sekular
Selangor
Sepitman Begins
sesat
Shafie Apdal
shah alam
Sidek Baba
Sistem Pendidikan Kebangsaan
skandal kewangan
Skuad Banjir Pemuda
sokongan masyarakat kepada MAS
Solat Hajat
SPR
SRJK Persendirian
steering lock
SUARAM
subsidi
Sultan Perak
Sultan Selangor
Sumpah Laknat
Sun Tzu'z Art of War
sungai besar
surah al kafirun
Syed Azmi Alhabshi
syiah
Tan Sri Isa Samad
Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim
Tan Sri Muhyiddin
Tanah Kebun Peneroka
Techno Crap
Teluk Intan
tembak
Tender Tanah
tender terbuka
Tengku Adnan
Teresa Kok
terhempas
The Economist
The Unspinners
The War Crimes Commission and Tribunal 2009
Titah DYMM Sultan Selangor
Titah DYTM Raja Muda Perak di Majlis Perasmian Penutupan Kongres Ekonomi Islam Ketiga
Toyota Camry 2.4 Perak
Truth for Teoh Beng Hock
Tsunami Cina
Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah
Tulisan Jawi
Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
Tun M
tuntutan
Ukraine
UMNO
UMNO Seremban
Uncle sim
Undang-undang antilompat parti wakil rakyat
Undang-Undang Tubuh Negeri Perak
Undi cina
undi hantu
Usahawan Bumiputera Pahang
Ustaz Kazim Elias
Utusan Malaysia
V. Sivakumar
video
WADAH
wall street journal
Wan Azizah
Wasiat Raja-Raja Melayu
Wong Siew Teng aka Agnes Wong
Yayasan Anti Peperangan Kuala Lumpur
Yusuf Qardhawi
Zahid Hamidi
Zahrain
Zaini Hassan
Zulkifli Noordin
6 ulasan:
Rasanya PM DSN ini bukan jenis orang yang spare the rod to spoil the brat. He will know what to do with the situation arising from the actions of this dog-in-the-manger Sivakumar.
He will act for the good of the majority.
This Siva & Co is like an office boy who struts around in the office like so much of cc. So it's not the least surprising in perak he is above the Sultan .. not knowing that people are just tolerating a delusional plucked ostrich.
Maybe he need something else rather than a rod to straightening out this dog-in-the-manger. It's hard to bend straight bamboo. Bamboo kalau dah keras kena 'layor' atas api untuk bagi lembut. Well, that's the only solution I guess. Haha.
Heh Heh, bila di 'layor' untung-untung bamboo tak melembut tapi anunya tak keras lagi.
Maksud pakcik suaranya.
Kalau anunya tak lagi keras maka tade la dia gatal nak merogol undang2.
Maksud saya mencabul undang2 ikut sedap dia je.
1 more thing:
Spare the brat and spoil the nation...
Hari ini (14hb April 2009) Yang Amat Arif Hakim-Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan (Federal Court) yang diketuai oleh Presiden Makamah Rayuan (ambil perhatian bahawa Presiden Mahkamah Rayuan juga adalah Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan) Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sherif, Hakim Besar Malaya Datuk Arifin Zakaria, Datuk Nik Hashim Nik Ab Rahman, Datuk S. Augustine Paul dan Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin sepakat bahawa Mahkamah Persekutuan mempunyai bidang kuasa mendengar dan menentukan samada keputusan pergantunggan Dato Zambry dan Exconya dari menghadiri sdiang itu mengikut undng-undang atau tidak (sah atau tidak). Sila lawati;
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=404155
April 14, 2009 20:13 PM
Zambry Used Correct Procedure To Challenge Speaker's Suspension - Federal Court
PUTRAJAYA, April 14 (Bernama) -- The Federal Court ruled today that Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir and his six state executive councillors had used the right procedure to challenge their suspension from attending the State Legislative Assembly sittings by Speaker V. Sivakumar.
Sebelum ini (awal April) mahkamah telah menolak bantahan awal bahawa Mahkamah Persekutuan tiada bidangkuasa menentukan isu peruntukkan dalam perlembagaan negeri hanya isu perlembagaan Persekutuan. Bantahan ini bagaimanapun tidak berjaya kerana Mahkamah Persekutuan tidak bersetuju dengan keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan. Mahkamah Rayuan sebelum ini memulangkan “paku buah keras” kepada Mahkamah Rayuan yang memutuskan bahawa peruntukkan perlembagaan negeri bukan sesuatu yang boleh dirujuk kepada Mahkamah Persekutuan.
Disegi ini, pada pandangan itu ada betulnya namun tidak tepat kerana Mahkamah Rayuan terlupa bahawa bidangkuasa Mahkamah Persekutuan meliputi bukan sahaja bidangkuasa Rayuan (appellate) tetapi termasuk bidangkuasa2 seperti Penyelian (supervisory), bidangkuasa semakan (revisionary) dan bidangkuasa asal (original). Malahan biangkuasa Mahkamah Persekutuan merangkumi dan melewati (goes beyond) apa-apa bidang kuasa yang terdapat pada Mahkamah Tinggi mahupun Mahkamah Rayuan. Maksud saya, Mahkamah Persekutuan tidak sekadar (walaupun kebiasaannya) mendengar rayuan dari mahkamah Rayuan (Court of Appeal) seperti difahami ramai. Lihat Courts of Judicature Act 1964,
Tidak lama kemudian (9hb April) Mahkamah Persekutuan memutuskan lagi bahawa Suruhanjaya Pilhanraya (dibawah Akta Pilihanraya) adalah kuasa menentu samada terdapatnya kerusi kosong DUN(casual vacancy) bukannya Speaker.
Kini pula (14th April) , Mahkamah Persekutuan sekali lagi memutuskan bahawa mahkamah persekutuan ada bidang kuasa mendengar dan menentukan samada Speker Sivakumar mempunyai kuasa untuk menggantungkan tugas MB (Dato Zambry) dan Exconya selama 18 bulan dari menghadiri sidang DUN. Dibawah Artikel 44 Undang2 Tubuh Negeri Perak (Perak State Constitution) Zambry dan 6 ahli ECO lain -- Zainol Fadzi Paharuddin, Datuk Ramly Zahari, Hamidah Osman, Datuk Saarani Mohamad, Mohd Zahir Abdul Khalid dan Dr Mah Hang Soon memohon deklarasi penggantungan mereka adalah tidak sah dan batal (null and void).
Halangan demi halangan (melalui bantahan awal) Sivakumar bahawa Mahkamah Persekutuan tiada bidang kuasa untuk mendengar dan menentukan kuasa Speaker ternyata gagal. Pada pandangan/hujah mereka, Mahkamah (Mahkamah Rendah, Tinggi, Rayuan, Persekutuan) tiada bidangkuasa mendengar dan menentukan samada tindak tanduk speaker yang kononnya kebal berdasarkan Artikel 72 Undang2 Tubuh Negeri Perak (Perak State Constitution) yang menyatakan bahawa kesahan (validity) apa-apa prosiding di DUN tidak boleh dipersoalkan di mana-mana Mahkamahpun.
Isunya kini ialah Setelah bantahan awal sivakumar gagal, persoalannya sekarang adalah samada Sivakumar mempunyai kuasa untuk menggantungkan MB Dato Zambri dan EXconya. Dalam hal ini apa itu "prosiding" menjadi isu penting?
Jika Mahkamah Persekutuan memutuskan spekaer tiada kuasa menggantung MB Dato Zambry dan Exconya, bermakna masaalah besar akan menimpa Spekaer kerana “pandai-pandai” menggantung mereka-mereka tersebut dengan menggunakan kuasa yang salah atau salah guna kuasa (apa bezanya –fikir sendiri).
Dibawah kanun Keseksaan (dibawah), jika sabit kesalahan, hukumannya (termasuk mereka2 yang bersekongkol juga) adalah berat;
121B. Offences against the authority of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Rulers or Yang di-Pertua Negeri.
Whoever compasses, imagines, invents or intends the deposition or deprivation of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong from the sovereignty of Malaysia or the deprivation or deposition of the Ruler, his heirs or successors, or of the Yang di-Pertua Negeri from the rule of a State, or the overawing by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force the Government of Malaysia or of any State, shall be punished with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.
121C. Abetting offences under section 121A or 121B.
Whoever abets the commission of any of the offences punishable by section 121A or 121B shall be punished with the punishment provided for the said offences.
124. Assaulting Member of Parliament, etc., with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power.
Whoever, with the intention of inducing or compelling or attempting to induce or compel a member of Parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or of any State Executive Council to exercise or refrain from exercising in any manner the lawful powers of such member, assaults or wrongfully restrains, or attempts wrongfully to restrain, or overawes by means of criminal force, or the show of criminal force, or attempts so to overawe, such member shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Maka, apakah pergantunngan MBDatZambry dan EXCONya sah?
http://syedsoutsidethebox.blogspot.com/2009/02/deterministic-chaos-in-perak.html
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2009
Deterministic Chaos In Perak
Here is a news report from the New Straits Times today:
Karpal stumped by Sivakumar's decision
IPOH: Pakatan Rakyat members are shaking their heads in disbelief over the suspension of Menteri Besar Datuk Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir and his six exco members by Speaker V. Sivakumar for 18 months and 12 months respectively.
Even DAP chairman Karpal Singh, a prominent lawyer, is stumped by Sivakumar's decision to order the suspension. Karpal told a press conference at Parliament House in Kuala Lumpur Sivakumar must call for the assembly to meet to endorse his decision to suspend Zambry and six executive councilors.
He said Sivakumar's decision must be endorsed by the house.
Several PR lawmakers here said the move was totally unexpected as they had painstakingly gone through the state constitution and the assembly's Standing Orders prior to Wednesday's hearing before the Rights and Privileges Committee.
"I was shocked upon hearing Sivakumar's decision. We had discussed about this (possibility of suspending Zambry and his exco members) and strongly advised against it. "By doing so, we have fallen into our own trap, akin to stepping on a banana peel planted by ourselves.
"I honestly do not know whose advice he (Sivakumar) took before making up his mind," said a PR lawmaker.
Karpal’s suggestion that Sivakumar should put the suspension to the Assembly first is echoed on both sides. Perak UMNO Youth secretary Hang Tuah Din cited Rule 72(2) of the Standing Orders stating :
“when the House was not in session, a state representative could complain to the Speaker of any offences. The Speaker, if satisfied that the offence appeared to have been committed, could refer it to the Rights and Privileges Committee. In turn, the committee must report it to the Assembly”
“It is clear he (Sivakumar) should have referred the matter to the Assembly, and not made a decision,” Hang Tuah told a press conference.
Hang Tuah Din’s statement tallies with Karpal’s view.
According to another comment, by not following the proper procedure, the Speaker has become “the investigator, the prosecutor and the judge at the same time” when such a decision by the Privileges Committees should have been referred to the House.
The Perak Assembly does not meet until April. Logically the Speaker cannot suspend any member of the Assembly until then. Pending the vote, the MB and the six Excos are not suspended. And when the Assembly sits in April, the MB and the six Excos targeted by Sivakumar must also have the right to vote over their own suspension. Otherwise it is as good as a confirmed suspension already and a mockery of the whole process.
(Imagine a situation where a Speaker goes berserk and suspends say 28 members of the Assembly. Why not? If the Speaker can suspend six Excos and the MB, why not suspend 12, 18 or 28 members of the Assembly?)
More importantly if you suspend an MB and six Exco members, how does the State Government function? How does this help the people of Perak? No matter how tasty or distasteful, the State of Perak and its people do not have an effective Government to rule its affairs. Is this what the Speaker Sivakumar really aims to do?
Granted that Sivakumar has a serious axe to grind with the new MB over the change in the Perak State Government. But that does not justify his present action. Suspending an MB and six Exco members on some excuse that they showed contempt to the State Legislature appears frivolous.
Again I can smell the presence of His Ineptitudeness here.
The suggestion that the MB and his Exco take this matter to Court to set aside the suspension imposed by the Speaker is sound. It must be pursued urgently.
If the Court sets aside the Speaker’s action, it is possible that it will be Sivakumar who is in contempt. This must be thought through extremely very carefully but Sivakumar can also be held in breach of other laws.
In my view treason against the Sultan is not an issue because Sivakumar has not denied that Zambry Kadir is the new MB of Perak. He recognizes the Sultan’s appointment of Zambry as the new MB. He has merely suspended the MB and six Excos based on procedure which does not seem right.
Lihat juga;
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Friday/Frontpage/2484884/Article/index_html
http://lenggongvalley.blogspot.com/2009/02/perak-pakatan-snared-in-own-trap-over.html
Sidang bawah pokok pula?
Berkenaan Fasal XXXVI (1) Undang2 Tubuh Negeri Perak jelas bahawa Sultan mempunyai kuasa dan hanya bertanggungjawab mengadakan paling tidak satu sidang setiap 6 bulan - tempoh ini pun belum tamat dan akan hanya tamat mengikut kata panel2 itu pada - 15 Mei 2009. (lihat Komen saya terhadap rancangan “Hujah, NTV9” pada 9.30 – 10.30 malam siaran langsung dari UiTM – “Krisis Perak” pada 31b Mac 2009)
Perkara XXXVI (1) Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Perak Darul Ridzuan memperuntuk “DYMM hendaklah dari semasa ke semasa memanggil bersidang Dewan Negeri itu dan tidaklah boleh membiarkan tempoh enam bulan berlalu di antara perjumpaan yang akhir lepas dalam satu persidangan dengan tarikh yang ditetapkan bagi perjumpaan yang pertama dalam persidangan yang di hadapan.”
Pun begitu, untuk sidang itu sah, suatu notis hendaklah diisukan oleh setiausaha DUN yang mana tidak dibuat. Notis ini adalah mandatori (wajib) sepertimana yang saya faham dari perbincangan panel2.
Pun begitu,
PT 1 (Perintah Tetap DUN) mengatakan “maka Setiausaha Dewan hendaklah membacakan Pemasyhuran DYMM Seri Sultan Perak Darul Ridzuan memanggil mesyuarat..”.
Maka Sultan mempunyai kata akhir (ultimate say) dan jika belum diperkenankan Sultan, pada pandangan saya jika sidang dibuat diDewan pun adalah tidak sah apatah lagi ditempat yang tidak diwartakan iaitu dibawah pokok?
“PT 10 (1) mengatakan “ Penggal Dewan hendaklah diadakan pada waktu dan tempat sebagaimana yang ditetapkan oleh DYMM Seri Sultan Perak Darul Ridzuan dari semasa ke semasa melalui perisytiharan dalam Warta,”
Fasal XXXVI (1) Undang2 Tubuh Perak memberi Sultan kata akhir (ultimate say) samada sidang DUN boleh atau tidak dibuat. Dalam hal ini, saya tidak nampak relevannya perbezaan samada sesi DUN di tangguhkan, prorogue atau sebab dibubarkan seperti mana pandangan Prof Dr Shad bahawa jika di tangguhkan perkenan Sultan tidak diperlukan lagi. Bukankah sultan mempunyai kata akhir (ultimate say, veto) dibawah Perkara XXXVI (1) Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Perak Darul Ridzuan untuk memerintah agar sidang yang ditangguhkanpun supaya tidak dibuat sehingga arahan selanjutnya dari Baginda Sultan. Tindakan mengunci” adalah bukti Sultan tidak perkenankan sidang itu dibuat.
Maka jika tiada perkenan Sultan, jangan nak kata sidang DUN didewan itu boleh sah, apatahlagi dibawah pokok.
Baru-baru ini, MB Perak Dato Zambry ada menyatakan disuratkhabar (13hb April) beliau akan meminta perkenan sultan untuk mengadakan sidang DUN dan menasihati Speaker DUN supaya bertindak mengikut Undang2.
Prof Madya Dr Abdul Rani Bin Kamarudin
Pensyarah Undang2 (Jabatan Undang2Awam) IIUM
Catat Ulasan